Social conservatives must rise up as one and say no lesbian is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court.
Yes, I'm a member of the queer community.
No, but I'm a straight Ally of the queer community, even more so from this experience of the prejudice they face.
In an email to students and faculty at the time, Kagan responded to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, stating: "I abhor the military's discriminatory recruitment policy."
There is no Federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
If Kagan is confirmed, "The hope of a nationally recognized right to gay marriage is over," writes William Jacobson, associate clinical professor of law at Cornell Law School.Jacobson notes that in a questionnaire she filled out as a nominee for solicitor general, Kagan unequivocally wrote, "There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage."The issue may come before the High Court because of a challenge that has been filed against California's Proposition 8, which bans gay marriage.
I couldn't care less what her sexual orientation is.And correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that stating, "There is no federal Constitutional right to gay marriage" is not the same thing as saying that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. Since we don't know what the question was, it's hard to interpret her answer. She may, for example, view marriage as a state (not federal) issue. Also, I think one could hold the view that marriage in general--any marriage--is not a Constitutional right, but that if a government grants marriage licenses at all, then it must not discriminate in its issuance of those licenses. (This is just some amateur speculation. I'm not a lawyer.)But it's interesting that this question is being raised at all--because for the last several nominees, abortion has been the litmus test. Will it now be gay marriage?
Anonymous may 12, 2010 3:49pm:you make a very good point about the subtleties of how her marriage quote might be interpreted. Thank you for that.And yes, it is interesting that the litmus test seems to have shifted...but does that mean the religious right is giving up on the anti-abortion fight, or just that they feel that fighting gay marriage energizes their base and donors more effectively? I'm sure there have been studies done in which they analyze which issues are more incendiary (and profitable) for them to exploit.Good stuff to consider. Thank you for joining the conversation,Namaste,Lee
What bothers me about this is the main reason why her sexuality is being questioned is because she is a 50 year old unmmarried woman. If she was a man would this be an issue at all?
Post a Comment
3 comments:
I couldn't care less what her sexual orientation is.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that stating, "There is no federal Constitutional right to gay marriage" is not the same thing as saying that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. Since we don't know what the question was, it's hard to interpret her answer. She may, for example, view marriage as a state (not federal) issue. Also, I think one could hold the view that marriage in general--any marriage--is not a Constitutional right, but that if a government grants marriage licenses at all, then it must not discriminate in its issuance of those licenses. (This is just some amateur speculation. I'm not a lawyer.)
But it's interesting that this question is being raised at all--because for the last several nominees, abortion has been the litmus test. Will it now be gay marriage?
Anonymous may 12, 2010 3:49pm:
you make a very good point about the subtleties of how her marriage quote might be interpreted. Thank you for that.
And yes, it is interesting that the litmus test seems to have shifted...
but does that mean the religious right is giving up on the anti-abortion fight, or just that they feel that fighting gay marriage energizes their base and donors more effectively? I'm sure there have been studies done in which they analyze which issues are more incendiary (and profitable) for them to exploit.
Good stuff to consider.
Thank you for joining the conversation,
Namaste,
Lee
What bothers me about this is the main reason why her sexuality is being questioned is because she is a 50 year old unmmarried woman. If she was a man would this be an issue at all?
Post a Comment